Lynch Law Offices, P.C.
Call Us Now for a FREE Consultation:
800-491-7493
Offices in Four Convenient Locations

7th Circuit opinion puts payday lender back on the hook

The payday loan industry sometimes seems impervious to corrective action. These are the companies, Internet-based for the most part, that give individuals who are in dire financial straits a quick infusion of cash. The borrowers agree to pay the loan back in a few weeks for what seems like a modest interest rate. The problem is that the interest rates are not moderate -- annualized, they can exceed 100 percent -- and the lender continues to offer "incentives" for the borrower to take out loan after loan after loan. The result can be a total financial meltdown.

Every so often, the Federal Trade Commission or the courts are able to catch a payday lender engaging in illegal or unscrupulous dealings with borrowers. In one recent case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the lender in a class action lawsuit filed by three Illinois borrowers. In this case, it was not the lending process itself or the three-digit interest rates that were at issue. Rather, it was a dispute resolution clause in the loan agreement.

Contracts sometimes include a clause that requires the parties to resolve disputes through arbitration (binding or non-binding). In some cases, the parties agree that arbitration will be the first step, but, if no agreement results, the parties are free to pursue a resolution in court. The payday loan agreement required arbitration.

Contracts generally have a "choice of law" clause, too. The choice refers to which state law the parties will follow if there is a dispute. Remember, contracts are governed by state law, and the laws may vary from state to state.

While this choice of law provision may sound like a picky thing, it can make an enormous difference to the parties. For example, Illinois has a five year statute of limitations for a breach of contract lawsuit, but Wisconsin's statute of limitations for the same issue is six years. Or, some states cap damage awards while their neighboring states do not.

The loan agreement had a particularly unusual choice of law clause, based on the owner's affiliation with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.

We'll continue this in our next post.

Source: The Cook County Record, "Seventh Circuit revives class action suit over payday loans; calls arbitration clause 'unconscionable' and process 'a sham,'" Jonathan Bilyk, Aug. 25, 2014 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

How Can we Help You? Contact An Attorney

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Four Convenient Office Locations To Serve You

Toll Free: 800-491-7493 Fax: 630-960-4755

Five Convenient Office Locations To Serve You

Lisle Office - DuPage County
1011 Warrenville Road
Suite 150
Lisle, IL 60532

Map & Directions

Lockport Office - Will County
900 South State Street
Second Floor, Suite A
Lockport, IL 60441

Map & Directions

Aurora Office - Kane County
1444 North Farnsworth
Suite 100
Aurora, IL 60505

Map & Directions

Palatine Office - Cook County
800 East Northwest Highway
Suite 700
Palatine, IL 60074

Map & Directions

Chicago Office - Cook County
1 S Dearborn
Suite 2100
Chicago, IL 60603

Map & Directions

Toll Free: 800-491-7493 Fax: 630-960-4755